Posts

Showing posts with the label Cindy McCain

LETTER TO VICE'S ANDREW RAYNOR

Vice contacted me saying they were doing a documentary on sex trafficking in Nevada about a month ago and wanted to interview some of our members who had been trafficked in Nevada.  I agreed to help them out but explained we don't keep our members in Nevada in Nevada except in rare circumstances.  Nevada is the only region in the world we have a presence/meeting where we move our members out of Nevada in order for them to safely recover.  They blew me off and I told them they wouldn't get anyone to talk to them in Nevada because of fear.   Then today I got an email back from Andrew saying they were "going with another topic".  Yeah sure with Jeane's "Black Book" and the election coming up, and Dennis Hof running for Senate, and John Hambrick being accused of "bullying" his way into Speaker of the House, Sheldon Adelson buying the Review Journal, Vivid moving into Nevada, and Lamar's incident - I'm going to believe Nevada's sex tr

WOULD YOU TRUST A CHILD WITH AN ADDICT WHO WON'T DISCUSS THEIR RECOVERY?

I don't have a problem with Cindy McCain having been a using addict in 1992 according to this article  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/11/AR2008091103928_2.html?sid=ST2008091103947   Lord knows I've been clean since 1985, so I'm not one to point fingers. But I'm not out going around trying to take over the sex trafficking arena in Phoenix that our program, Sex Workers Anonymous formerly Prostitutes Anonymous, has been an integral part of the scene down in Phoenix since 1989 over all if you count when we were first working with Kathleen Mitchell, before she founded Dignity. Nor am I building a complete infrastructure to separate out children who "appear" to be "trafficking victims" from the "other" children from the criminal justice system, and talking about putting them into the non-existent mental health system for juveniles in Phoenix during a time when there is such a crisis going on right now in Phoenix

"DIVERT THEM" - READ THIS VERY CAREFULLY

http://tucson.com/news/blogs/police-beat/governor-oks-tougher-law-against-human-trafficking/article_fce7f065-a293-507f-8244-8c3cb6ee098f.html I want you to note something about this news article.   It says they want to "separate out" from the "system" children who "may be trafficking victims" to go into "social services" instead of what exactly?  Now if we're "not identifying them as prostitutes" then how exactly are they being "separated out"? What this sounds like to me is that children who are attractive, developed, and can be viewed as sexual objects are going to now have a COVER for when they are treated differently than children who may be disabled, overweight, unattractive, etc. "Oh uh uh uh I'm going to put them into a special program for juveniles who may be trafficking victims". WHAT PROGRAM? Do you see one?  Did I lay one around here somewhere? I invite you to read this booklet on how t

MONOPOLY? SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE?

Image
I believe I'm dealing with a "monopoly".  Let me start with Arizona: Since this information has been released to the press - I'm not breaking any confidences here speaking about Kathleen Mitchell and Prostitutes Anonymous out of Arizona.  I received a letter from her from jail asking for help to stop being arrested over and over again for prostitution from Kathleen about 1989.  I sent her our "jail step study" program which we send to inmates to let them "work their steps" from jail, along with our 1st edition "Recovery Guide" as a donation.  In other words, she didn't pay anything for these items. She was released about 1990 and asked me "now what?"  We had no chapter of "Prostitutes Anonymous" (as we were originally called back then although we changed our name in 1995 to "Sex Workers Anonymous").  Not really having the ability to do street outreach by herself, I suggested she do what I did to start