Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Bradley Myles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bradley Myles. Show all posts

Monday, February 27, 2017

POLARIS FORUM AND GIVING UP YOUR 5TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS

Has everyone forgot a little detail called the 5th amendment in this country?  

First of all, prostitution in the USA everywhere but a few tiny counties in Nevada is ILLEGAL.  Forced or not, many of the things sex trafficking victims are forced to do are ILLEGAL.  Even if it's a matter of unreported earnings to the IRS - we're still talking a possible criminal charge here could be over one's head.

Now unless that survivor has gone completely through the legal system and it's been determined by their lawyers there aren't any possible ways they can have a case come up on them in the future, or that they may be called upon to become an "informant" in an ongoing case, there are good sound solid reasons why a survivor would want to remain "anonymous" about who they are and what they've experienced.

Do I have to remind people what happened to Celeste Guap?  She wasn't supposedly a "criminal" but a "victim".  She spoke up in the media about being a survivor and next thing she knows she's being shuttled off to a treatment center in Florida SUPPOSEDLY to "help" her.  Only next thing she knows there's a guard there claiming she was assaulted and sexually approached by Celeste and she's carted off on a $300,000 bail.  During the time she was being held, because who has $300,000 bail, the authorities say she was "offered a deal".  Anyone who has been in her shoes knows what that means - it means drop your case against the 30 plus cops who sexually raped you while a minor, and who sexually trafficked you while cops and even Chief of Police, or we'll throw you in jail!  

Celeste Guap illustrates the dangers of coming forward about being a survivor without having FIRST had proper legal council.  Hence one of the very reasons why we formed our program as www.sexworkersanonymous.com

It's why we don't ask you your name when you call our hotline, and we'll even tell you NOT to tell us your name.  Unlike Polaris, we don't collect your IP address either which is way more revealing than a name by the way.

Coming forward openly as a survivor REQUIRES you understand your 5th amendment rights before doing so.  Even if you haven't committed one crime unanswered for in the past - if you even know people the police want to build a case upon you're in danger of issues as Celeste Guap's case illustrates beautifully.  She steps up to reveal she's a victim without having had proper legal council first and look at what happened to her!  This doesn't even TOUCH upon if you might have something to say someone is worried you MIGHT say.  I say this because I spent the first year after I was first arrested dodging bullets from people who were worried about what I MIGHT  say to the cops despite my assurances I wasn't going to say anything.  Look at Jeane Palfrey for example who I believe was murdered by people who didn't want their names revealed during the ethics hearing she was going to testify at.

I for example did not appear on any media until I had consulted with an attorney licensed in the state I was in who advised me that any statutes on anything I was involved with had tolled, and that I could not be compelled by virtue of being on probation, or any thing else hanging over my head law enforcement used to try and get me to become an informant back in my day.

I had the LAPD arrest my mother and threaten me with charging her, and even possibly charging my grandmother, with felony pimping if I did not agree to "snitch" on other people as an informant to build their cases for them.  In my case, my mother said to the prosecutor "we're not snitches" and we took our lumps.  But that was our decision to make.  The point remains that I have experienced law enforcement manufacturing crazy accusations against me to try and force me to become an informant for them.

I say "crazy" because the case they laid on my mother was based on a photograph of me handing her a $20 bill for a bucket of KFC chicken.  Under the law it does state the "receipt of money from a prostitute" constitutes a felony pimping charge.  Yes it would have had to have been proved I was a prostitute.  But over the years I've seen this is a very common tactic of law enforcement - to charge, or threaten to charge, one's family members with a crime in order to compel you do become an informant for them, or plead guilty to something yourself.

Now with my mom, to plead not guilty would mean I'd still be looking at a very expensive case where I'd have to hire an attorney to defend her, my grandmother (who was 70 at the time) and myself.  As it was the government took everything I owned away from me and then said I had to "prove where I got the money from" to buy those items before they'd give anything back.  Since most of everything was gifts I had no way of proving anything without dragging other people into the equation which was further what the cops wanted - to know information on who was providing me with such expensive gifts.  All done to try and force me to become an "informant" for them.

NOW NOWHERE in this invitation do I see any caution about being careful to protect one's 5th amendment rights to "not incriminate themselves" in any fashion but I do see that it's asking for "only survivors" to step up to the plate here.  The lack of acknowledgement that one needs to be sure in doing so they are not incriminating themselves in some fashion not even being an issue in this invitation tells me there's either one or both of a serious problem here - either the fact this isn't being run by survivors who would understand this is an issue OR the fact they are partners with people actively seeking information such as Palantir Technologies, Google, and Merck who are "partners" now with Polaris is a deliberate move here.

So which is it Polaris?  Why is there no warning or caution here about anything anyone who might participate in this forum being advised to consult with an attorney before doing such a forum to ensure they aren't going to say something which could incriminate them for past actions?  Was this a deliberate omission or just you don't have a friggin clue what being a survivor in America truly means?

You're asking survivors to risk incarceration, legal prosecution, even possibly someone deciding they're a risk and ordering a contract out on them by asking them to identify as a survivor at this forum.  I see no cautions about anything in this invitation about the dangers of identifying with you as a survivor.  Not even just with you - but even over phone and internet lines which can be hacked by traffickers targeting your servers.

So why is that Polaris?


National Human Trafficking Hotline

Azurdee,
The National Human Trafficking Hotline is first and foremost a survivor hotline -- it belongs to survivors and the community-at-large that it seeks to serve. It is important, therefore, that survivor voices, needs, concerns, expertise, and values always be at the heart of our work. 
In 2017, our commitment to engage, include, and empower survivors in our work will include quarterly open forums for survivors to call in, ask questions, give suggestions, and share feedback about the Hotline.
Survivor input will drive the overall content and agenda of these calls moving forward, but the first call will focus on giving an overview of the National Human Trafficking Hotline, its operations and protocols, its current capacity and constraints, an introduction to our staff and the training they receive, and then we will open the floor to share questions and feedback on these topics. Questions can be submitted in advance by replying to this email or through the GoTo Meeting chat function during the call. Any question that we do not have time to answer will be answered in a follow up email.
The first of these conference calls will take place on March 7, 2017 at 3:30 p.m. EST. ALL survivors are welcome and encouraged to participate, so please spread the word throughout your networks. We ask that only survivors of human trafficking participate in the call.
Please RSVP to this invite no later than March 3, 2017 at 12:00 p.m. EST.
We greatly look forward to hearing from all of you.
Sincerely,
Lara Powers and the National Human Trafficking Hotline staff
This publication was made possible in part through Grant Number 90ZV0102 from the Office on Trafficking in Persons, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office on Trafficking in Persons, Administration for Children and Families, or HHS.
  
National Human Trafficking Hotline
24 Hour National Hotline: 1-888-373-7888

To ensure future delivery of Hotline e-mails, please add
help@humantraffickinghotline.org to your Address Book or Safe Sender List.

© Copyright Polaris. All Rights Reserved.



Tuesday, October 11, 2016

LETTER TO BRADLEY MYLES RE: BACKPAGE ARREST OF CARL FERRER

Jody Williams, Founder & Director
Sex Workers Anonymous (formerly Prostitutes Anonymous)
www.sexworkersanonymous.com
(702) 488-1127 or (888) 666-1782

October 11, 2016

Bradley Myles c/o
Polaris Via Email & Fax

Re: Backpage Arrest

Dear Mr. Myles:

I'm sure an educated man such as yourself has probably heard of the poem popularized by John Godfrey Saxe entitled “The Blind Men & the Elephant”. This poem if you remember was based on a story that's been repeated in many cultures about the blind men called upon to describe an elephant. However, each one of them was feeling a different part of the animal – thus one was feeling the tail vs. the other feeling the tusk. While each was “correct” at the part they were describing - they were still “disagreeing” with each other about what it was simply because of having a different perspective.

I'm writing to you today because I believe we may be looking at the same “animal” from “different perspectives” called the “sex industry”. Neither one of us “right” or “wrong” but certainly it would provide a better description of the beast if we were communicating with each other. I'm writing you this long letter because I'd like to know I've at least attempted to open up a dialogue about this “elephant” even though my previous attempts to have us engage in a dialogue with each other have been rebuffed. I assure you while I'm being treated in this manner, it's not exactly encouraging our other members to try and speak to you openly either. Remember, our members are very real, just most of them choosing to remain “anonymous”.I am a “survivor” also of many different types of sex trafficking – so whatever you think of me a survivor I am. Meaning how others see you treat me – is how they perceive you to treat “survivors” when they're not being of direct use to you when you're trying to get a grant approved or an agenda pushed through.

So I've not spoken to you directly about my arrest in 1984 but you can read it with the clips I've posted at www.hightechmadam.com Contrary to what the story appears to be about - this warehouse I was arrested in connection with was not a “brothel” I was operating. As a matter of fact, at the time of my arrest I had completely “retired” out of the sex industry. After buying my way out of a generational family of people involved in prostitution who were related to Richard Pryor's family (who he's been open about his mother working in his grandmother's brothel so I'm not violating a confidence here) who had lured me into the sex industry, then “turned me out” and pimped me using fear as their tool for a few years - word soon spread on the “streets” I was now an “independent” prostitute. This is actually when the real problems started for me.

With this “family” no longer acting as “protection” for me, I was approached first by LAPD officers who were running an escort service known as “Talk of the Town” back then (they were later arrested but claimed it was an “undercover operation” no one knew about so nothing was done to them). They doubled as a casting and modeling agency so prostitutes could literally be written into the budgets of films and modeling projects and thus paid for using credit cards or company checks. Paramount Studios had this scandal break about just this sort of practice in the 1990's. Their escorts were supplied to the “Hollywood elite”. The clients, or “johns” were assured none of “their” escorts would have a disease, would steal from anyone, nor would anything which transpired leak to the press. They were assured these women were “under the control and management” of LAPD” and thus their discretion with the press, and wives, was guaranteed.

To further prove their point, any actor caught picking up an “independent” such as when Eddie Murphy picked up Devine Brown off the streets was soon blasted all over the media. News of this sort was used to make sure other “johns” knew if they didn't want to wind up a public laughing stock – they needed to stick with using “Talk of the Town” to supply their needs. To recruit women to work for them, basically anyone not working with them was arrested. Shortly after I initially refused to work for them I was arrested for prostitution myself to prove their point they could give me a record if they wanted to. So I saw firsthand back then how the corrupt police work in conjunction with the media to “advertise” their “black market” services in the way it's done when you're talking about an illegal service such as illegal prostitution. When one can't take out an ad in the yellow pages – well then one gets a little creative in spreading the word.

Looking back, you'll notice it was only when actors such as Eddie Murphy, Hugh Grant, or Danny Bonaduce picked up “street” prostitutes were these stories blasted all over the press. These was a noticeable absence of such stories coming out of the services ran by Alex Adams, better known as the Beverly Hills Madam, who was not only working with these LAPD, but also the FBI as an “informant” back then. This was all done to encourage men of power and prestige to frequent only “the right” services or “else”.

These officers of course insisted upon sex for free upon demand in exchange for their “protection” as well as access to these “well paying clients”. Which any way you slice it - it's a form of rape. There's no point in even saying “no” to this where it's the word of a “whore” over a Beverly Hills police officer. Especially when they can shoot you so easily as men like Paul Tanaka have done. I ask you if even in cases like the Rodney King case where there's been horrible abuse, even the murder of someone wrongfully, by the police – what's done to them? For that matter, what's been done in the Sandra Bland case? In situations like this, you view giving them sex free is better than winding up dead. It's just “understood”.

My relationship with them soon had me seeing politicians, celebrities, and making all kinds of business deals above and beyond that of just prostitution. This was an organized criminal operation. These cops were literally taking drugs off drug dealers, then giving them to us to carry on their drug deals. That way if anyone got stopped or arrested it would be one of “us” charged for it - not one of them. Remember, this was a time before Google, cell phones, internet, etc. existed. I certainly had no way of taping any of these threats back then. It also meant “madams” did more than just send out escorts back then. If you wanted to know where or how to get just about anything on the “streets”– the “madams” of that day was your source.

Through these cops I found myself, under threat of false arrest or even worse (keep in mind prostitutes were winding up dead in alleys all over LA then and this was attributed to the many serial killers operating then with no one investigating these cases at all. Even mothers of dead prostitutes in the streets were going completely unresponded to by LAPD when the body count started seriously mounting.), being asked to arrange all kinds of deals. I soon found myself being asked to arrange anything from connecting up a money counterfeiter to a guy who made unmarked guns in his garage as a madam. Our escorts were also used to pump some “johns” for “inside information” which was then relayed back to these same cops.

One of these requests included recruiting women to audition for the hit show back then “The Dating Game”. At first, we were told it would be “good exposure” for a working girl to “be on TV”. As an enticement, we were then assured “our girls” would be set up to win “lavish vacations”. However, we started noticing some of these locations weren't exactly in “tourist” spots. Then some of them weren't coming back. Mind you this was before Chuck Barris had confessed about being a CIA operative in his book “Confessions of a Dangerous Mind”. Through Chuck, we started being asked to do stranger and stranger things.

Until I was then introduced to another man identifying himself to be a CIA agent. This man asked for my “help” in all sorts of drug deals which I later learned had been called “Iran Contra”. You know what this was I'm sure – the CIA bringing cocaine into this country to raise “off the books” cash to buy guns for the Contra's. Back then however all this young woman in her 20's knew was that I was seeing crates of cocaine being unloaded off planes and boats, then processed by south central gang members (also being threatened with arrest if they didn't cooperate), with my “girls” being asked to transport the drug from these crack houses to Bel Air homes. Places where a “Blood” or a “Crypt” would stick out like a sore thumb but we blended in just fine. So us prostitutes and madams were the glue between the gangs and Bel Air.
Once I was in deep – I was then asked to supply them with women “who had no family”. When I asked why, I was shown an operation involved diplomat's planes taking these women out of the country never to be seen or heard from again. To prove this was not a joke – I watched as women I knew were loaded onto one of these planes like cattle and there was nothing I could do to stop that plane from taking off.

This is when I set my foot down and decided it was time for me to get the hell out of this whole thing. Especially before I was one of the women loaded onto that plane. Even more so when I learned there wasn't even a law about it on the books. If you've seen the first ten minutes of “Enter the Dragon” with Bruce Lee dated 1973 – the whole opening is on just how American women were being trafficked and there wasn't one law on the books to do a damn thing to stop it. After having the head of the Hillside Strangler Task Force throw me and a woman they'd stabbed 51 times out of their office claiming they couldn't even “get a warrant based on the world of a whore” - this is when I realized there was no safety for us anywhere while we were clearly being hunted like game.

I moved, changed my number, got some phony ID, and did just that – got the hell out of all of this. Something I was able to do back prior to 1984 in a way which would be impossible to do today between technology and the Patriot Act I need to add. But other women wanted my help to get “out of there” also once they saw I'd gotten out alive. I had six months left on my lease at this warehouse in Van Nuys I had once used as an adult theater, so I converted it into what I later learned was the first safe house for adult sex trafficking victims anywhere in the USA.

One night, the police literally did try and storm the place to retrieve two women I'd stashed there. This is when they learned our security was holding but for that reason then became the target that I did. These men weren't used to losing anyone. They were used to places like shelters either refusing to accept us, or if they did take us, it was some shelter who they could flash their badge, say they wanted to “ask us a few questions” and then this person was never heard from again.

NO ONE followed up when we disappeared back then – especially if we were over 18 years of age. Which back then the people I was involved with pretty much stuck to adults for that reason – you couldn't even file a missing persons report for 24 hours when one of us went missing. Then if we did go missing – we were written off as “just a whore”. I never saw a search team organized for one of us back then ever.

I later learned 1984 was when a lot of us “madams” balked at the requests given to us by the CIA. If you look back in your history books, you'll see I wasn't the only one arrested that year, nor was it about the Olympics either. Sure I was arrested that year, as was Cheri Woods and Alex Adams in California, but Sydney Biddle Barrows was also arrested in New York this same year. When I later questioned each of them about their arrest – I was told the same story by each. They each also had been asked to supply “women with no family” to be sold like cattle overseas and had refused. Even madams believe it or not have their limits you see. We “earned” our money yes illegally. But we had balked at the idea of being involved in the sale of another human being which might even have meant their death for all we knew.

Like each of them also that year, I was “framed” for my arrest. I had a young woman call me up for help who I didn't know had been sent to me by police offering to drop her probation if she set me up. She'd told me her pimp had broken her arm and nose, as well as blacked both of her eyes and she asked me if I would help her get away from him. I put her up in the warehouse I'd converted into a safe house to rest and heal. I also told her I had cut off all my phones, stopped running my ads, and was no longer “in the game”. The next thing I know I'm being arrested on “pimping” charges supposedly of her.

Of course there wasn't a shred of evidence against me because I wasn't “pimping” her or anyone. So to make things stick they even arrested my mother charging her with pimping me. To ensure the press printed “their” story of what was going down and not mine – I had my bail jacked up to over $50,000 with no 10 % taken. This prevented any reporter from talking to me as I had been sent to the main jail. While I was being held – the police confiscated all of my money and belongings as well as guaranteed I wouldn't be able to go out and get any “job” anywhere outside of the sex industry. The point was to “break” me financially, as well as cut me off from my support, so that I'd come back “to the streets” and do what they wanted me to do under their promise they'd drop the case. This experience also taught me things aren't always as they appear to be when stories are being manufactured by “sex traffickers”. So I've learned how to tell from my own experiences when someone is also being railroaded by others who have an agenda.

I'm telling you all of this for a reason. If you remember last year when the show “8 Minutes” was airing on A&E – you had released a statement you had not given Kevin Brown, not the producers of the show, permission to air your hotline in connection with it. If he was running a “legit” rescue, and was what he was pretending to be on that show, then he would have clearly obtained your consent to use, and be using, your hotline number as I even am. I have a listing on your site. But I'm actually running a program. So one has to ask then what was the purpose behind a show I read had cost over $1,000,000 just to produce the pilot alone in that series. For a “fake” rescue? I mean what's up here? Plus what does “8 Minutes” have to do with the recent arrest of Carl Ferrer, CEO of Backpage?

You have to realize your hotline by nature of what it does is going to get a different set of calls than our hotline receives. You limit your calls to that of being from the victims themselves who self-identify as “victims of sex trafficking”. That and “other's” who report to you of suspected “sex trafficking”. So from what I know about your hotline – you only, and solely, take calls from someone who calls you up themselves about themselves who says to you “I'm being trafficked and I want out?” In other words, that's your end of the elephant you're going to be seeing.

However, your advertising for those to call you who “suspect sex trafficking” or “tip” calls bear honestly more resemblance to that of an illegal prostitute, or even someone who is being “pimped” instead of someone who I would classify as a “sex trafficking” victim. Mind you when I started our hotline in 1987 after I got my case from this 1984 arrest cleaned out of the way, and established the men who had been involved in my situation were gone out of the way, we couldn't afford to make any distinction to turn anyone away because we were the only hotline out there for adults to call for help. So we've always encouraged anyone who for any reason wanted help to leave any part of the sex industry for any reason to call us. This has included the “independent” sex worker, those who were being “pimped” and those who were trying to escape a sex trafficking operation. Meaning we've been getting calls from all factions from 1987 on.

I also invite you to be aware of who you would refer people to in both Texas where the show was filmed, as well as California where Kevin Brown is from, in light of what you now know about with respect to Joohon David Lee, Celeste Guap, Chief Lee Baca, the OC and San Diego prosecutors' office scandal, and other things which came to light after the show aired in May of 2015, which were happening during, and before, it's filming. In other words, you are aware anyone calling in the LA area for example back then would have most likely have been referred back to either Joohon David Lee, or someone who knew him. Since he was with Homeland Security, ICE and the sex trafficking task forces in both California and Nevada – it's pretty much a given he would have been notified of such a call just as he was when I complained to LAX about his very operation. Even possibly now as the man who “bribed” him hasn't been arrested yet.

I say that you're going to get a different type of call then we do most of the time because in our experience most sex trafficking victims fall into two categories. Either that of being in denial about being a “victim” for one reason or another which may include being brainwashed into not realizing they're being forced or controlled against their will, or those who may be like I was back in my day. I say that because I had a very sharp prosecutor on my case. He knew I was being railroaded and he BEGGED me to “come clean” and tell him the “truth” about what in the hell was going on with me. So I mean those like me who are well aware they're being “trafficked”, but who are too afraid to speak up to the authorities because of fear.

In my case I refused to tell this prosecutor anything about what I knew back then because I had seen what these people could do. I'd seen their power to kill people even in jail and also knew they were connected to the highest levels of government. That once the domino's started falling if I “talked” - that some man in a suit and a briefcase would show up saying the words “national security” and my defense would be shut down on the spot. IF I even made it alive that far.

I also wasn't stupid. I knew that if I started talking about things like “Chuck Barris is working for the CIA” then all I'd be doing is qualifying myself to be carted off to the nut ward. Remember, I'd just witnessed Linda Lovelace trying emphatically to convince America she'd been forced to film “Deep Throat” by a gun pointed at her from off camera while no one stepped up to help her because this was a mob financed film, i.e., she was a victim of what we now call “sex trafficking” just a few years earlier in 1980. If no one believed her – then why would I think they'd believe me?

I'd seen that despite the bruises clearly visible on her in the film, I had witnessed our legal system powerless to do a thing. There wasn't even a law on the books to help her. Well meaning law enforcement tried charging everyone else on the film but her with “obscenity” as it was the closest thing they could find to try and hold these men responsible for their crimes. Because they were using Marilyn Chambers to call Linda a “liar” and write off her accusations as “petty jealously” - no one was held accountable for the crimes committed against Linda. I didn't even see Marilyn in a Narcotics Anonymous meeting admitting Chuck (their pimp) had been drugging her during the time she was countering Linda's accusations until 1984. By that time, the world had pretty much believed anyone who spoke about things like “organized crime” or “forced prostitution” let alone “white slavery” was “crazy” as they'd painted Linda out to be. I bring up Marilyn because I believe Maxine Doogan is the “Marilyn Chambers” of today. Everything about what I went through in the 1980's in fact I'm watching repeating itself today – just with different faces and names.

Knowing men and women coming from situations like Linda and I had been in, are coming out of fantastic situations that most of the world would put on the level as they would someone talking about “little green aliens” because of how “crazy” these things sound, as well that what is now term “sex trafficking” always involves corrupt law enforcement on some level, combined with how the media was portraying my case as well as Linda's (which was connected through Meyer Lansky back then) – we've always promoted our hotline in such a manner as to encourage calls from THAT type of victim. Someone who can't call 911 for help for one. As well as maybe they know their story might sound “crazy”. But mostly also knowing there's not a chance in hell they'll ever get a conviction against their traffickers for one reason or another. That reason could be there is not even a law on the books for what's being done to them yet which is still sadly the case as with the victims of Joohon David Lee as but one example. Look at the Cincinnati case or even what those DEA agents were doing to those Columbian women. Have they been held accountable?

Which is what set off the whole house of cards with that show “8 Minutes”. Up until Robin Few's death in 2012, I had a very good relationship with SWOP, Desiree Alliance, Red Umbrella Foundation, and basically any group who worked with either “harm reduction” for sex workers, or unions such as SWEAT. The reason is obvious – our program isn't one strictly to help sex trafficking victims as your hotline is. Our program is to help ANYONE who for ANY reason wants to leave ANY part of the sex industry. We've been, and still are in some locations, being used for diversion, alternative sentencing, early release, re-entry and jail programs designed to help people quit the sex industry. A true “sex trafficking” call for us accounts for maybe 10 % of the calls we receive overall. The rest fall into either the “independent” or “pimped” category.

But I ask you, who else better to help those leaving the industry who are trafficked, pimped, etc., than another ex-sex worker? Also, who else is on the “front lines” to identify where people are being trafficked than someone in the industry? Especially when it's illegal? Especially when witnesses to sex trafficking know to call the cops they're incriminating themselves. So when groups like PACE, HIPS, or SWOP would be doing their outreach prior to 2012, and they would come across someone saying they wanted help to leave the industry including those who were being pimped and/or trafficked – they would call us. They knew the sex industry is a very very small world and the only way to get these completely out, and keep them out, was to call upon us. They also know after deaths of people like Margo Compton, that our legal system, even the so called “rescue” programs, are still not set up to address helping those who are trying to leave organized crime which in almost every case again does involve some form of corruption. If you look at the “safe houses” now in the USA – I don't know of but one who accepts males or transgenders.

So we get different types of calls on our hotline than you would. Thus we are given a different perspective on things than you might be. Especially now since Robin's death, this group of “influencers” have arisen who we believe are working as “recruiters” as well as “influencers” now within the sex industry. Not at all different from when large corporations hire an “influencer” and “recruiter” to make sure their company grows larger while not forming a union. Anyone who knows me knows I haven't stopped the brothels expansion because I'm against prostitution – but because I'm against the way they treat their workers.

I say that because the legal brothels out of Nevada have tried three times now to expand their operations outside of those small counties. Each time they've tried before to do this, my efforts have been directly responsible for their failure. In fact, the Mob Museum wouldn't be open today had they won the last round to put a legal brothel where it now operates, as well as the new Arts District which is there now too. Since Robin's death, these “influencers” who include women like Maxine Doogan and Domina Elle have risen up. They're done this to not only make sure a “union” doesn't form among sex workers, but to further create a “counter” influence to scare sex workers off trusting us the way they were prior to Robin's death. I also want you to note their connection to not only the show “8 Minutes” but “50 Shades of Grey” and the “Girlfriend Experience” as well. The videogame industry is not the only one hiring “online influencers”.

The Nevada legal brothels have had more problems with me than just these three campaigns they lost. Big ones I should add. With the first one in 1988, Joe Conforte had put up a $1,000,000 into a PR firm to win a proposition to bring legal brothels into California. He had also paid about that much to a university to do a HIV/AIDS study which was completely “rigged” in his favor. It was to make it appear no one at his brothel ever contracted the virus to try and use the fear then as a marketing tool as well as to push to expand. So when he lost that year, he lost a lot of money and put a whole other ball into motion. That was of us coming to the rescue of the women working within these legal brothels.

After taping a Sally Jesse Raphael talk show in 1988, one of the women he'd brought onto the show came running up to me after taping was done. She reported she had been drugged, then forced at gunpoint onto a private plane where she had been “told” to rehearse scripted lines for the show talking about how “wonderful” working conditions were there. This woman then begged me to get her out of there – telling me if she even tried to leave the place on foot she'd be arrested. I never heard of such a thing, but went ahead and got her out of there in a staged stunt making it appear an ambulance took her out of the studio. Once we got her safely into a program up there which had Brenda Myers-Powell there who I was working with at the time too, Genesis House, word spread back to Nevada one could call me for help and get it.

It turns out she was telling the truth – it literally was against the law for her to walk out of there on foot. Walking being the operative word because none of these brothels were in cities where there was a cab service, nor was there any bus line which would take one from where the brothels were to any of the major cities where there was an airport to get out of the state entirely. Without their money which was held from them – they can't even hire a limo to come down to pick them up. Considering how the police, and the laws, in the state of Nevada favor the brothel owners, these women wanted out of the state entirely. Combine this with the relatively few cops in these cities, who then made most of their money from Joe, well these women couldn't turn to the police to get out of there either. Not when a call to them usually wound up with them being the ones arrested under these unconstitutional laws barring them from leaving on foot. A cop also isn't going to drive them to the nearest airport either – even if they did arrest someone.

After this first “rescue” in Nevada, I started getting more and more calls to help these women leave out of there. Being the only program who would do this, when a woman would go “awol” the brothel owners knew it was us helping these women. Since the only way I've known to stop the kind of abuse I'm having these women as young as 16 years old are telling me is going on up there “legally” (or in ways we can't get them arrested for anyway), we've had an “unofficial” war going on between us and the legal brothels. We'd set about to get as many of them shut down as possible for a while there. A campaign which was also very successful. We had gotten quite a few of them shut down for a while there. So many it even hit the news.

That was until Sheldon Adelson decided he wanted to not only oppose Obama, but also he wanted to expand legal prostitution through the USA, all while opposing unions of any kind. This is when he started bank rolling these efforts. For every brothel we started getting shut down about then, we found Dennis would then go and buy them out. We really got on their “shit list” when one woman came to us with enough witnesses, and evidence to test out these new “sex trafficking” laws. She was going to be the first person ever to prosecute a “sex trafficker” within a “legal brothel”. Only before we could get the case pulled together, it was sold to Dennis, all the witnesses threatened and scattered, as well as this woman's life threatened. To find her to make these threats - they spared no expense. Hiring another “catfish” pretending to be a photojournalist from Finland supposedly working on a magazine project. To make it all look “real” they even flew a woman over from Finland – fake portfolio of her work and all.

When we exposed this for the fraud it was and alerted those who she'd been lying to what her real mission was – that's when the threats against us escalated to being more serious. We'd had some hand by this point in time for exposing Samoly Mam as a “fraud”, as well as Stella Marr, Chong Kim, William Hilliar, and now also this “photojournalist”. So finding there have been “fake” victims, fake “rescuers” and even fake “photojournalists”, who knew there would soon come “fake” reality series and even fake “sex workers advocates” as again Maxine Doogan and Domina Elle are turning out to be. Yes we have attacked these “fakes” and done so with good reason – because they've been covering up what the REAL traffickers in this country are doing, how they're doing it, who is doing it, and also diverting resources to fight them.

We had exposed “Cat House” as being staged and called out produced by Dennis Hof. Our efforts resulted in the show being taken off the air briefly, and then “relabeled” along with the producer finally admitting actors had been paid to stage this so called “reality” show about the sex industry. This show had been produced as a marketing and recruiting tool bearing no resemblance to the reality others coming out of there were reporting to us. Now why did we raise such a stink about it using actors and scripts? Because again people were walking around talking about the “legal brothels” based upon thinking this show was “reality”. Therefore, it was important for us to reveal it had been in fact staged and scripted with paid actors so people knew it wasn't what “really” goes on within those places.

But the others to follow which were faked were all done by Relativity Media. This included “Gigolo's” about male prostitution and “G Sting Diva's” about strippers. Relativity Media I also need to add films “Jail”, “OC Jail”, “Intervention” and “Catfish” - giving them a lot of access within these operations. Before starting filming on “8 Minutes” Relativity Media received a lot of money from another film company who was owned by the Chinese government. This was before Liang Yaohui, and at least 50 other men who were part of the Chinese government, were arrested for trafficking and corruption who were also connected to the same film company who invested over $12 million dollars in Relativity Media.

One of the founders of Relativity Media also bought PBS shortly before producing “A Path Appears”. Another show many feel was “staged” because of the connection to Nicholas Kristof – the man who was partially behind Samoly Mam talking her into her fake campaign and that whole sham which defrauded people out of millions of dollars as well as created a very false impression of what “real” American sex trafficking victims are like once rescued. The stories she told like even her daughter was “beheaded” being a lie were completely outrageous as well as misleading. I'd be “bright and cheery” to people too if I was out shaking hands asking for millions of dollars. All con artists do. Most true survivors however I've found, not even myself, can physically keep up the campaign trail she embarked upon – a sign that gave her away. But realize while she was sucking up the press with her false stories about sex trafficking – real stories from real victims about real trafficking, especially in America, in need of American support, was being diverted. No differently than when I went to MTV for help about Snoop Dogg's “RV pimp revival tour” in 2003 he confessed to in Rolling Stone. I did that because they were in the middle of producing a documentary about our work along with a PSA series. But the minute I talked about working on this case – suddenly the producer I was talking to was fired. No one there left knew who I was. The project was clearly canceled about our work. Then all of the money and talk they'd at first been putting into dealing with American sex trafficking happening right then and there – completely transformed into a launch of MTV Exit in Swenden. Which is great for Swedon – but what about the fact of the victims right here who had whole states refusing to help them because no one wanted “to be another OJ case” on the news? THIS is the danger when using other countries as a way of “smoke screening” what's going on right here right now.

With respect to “8 Minutes”, we had started getting strange calls about Kevin Brown, Greg Reese, and the show long before it aired. In fact, they had called us up asking to send women to a motel so they could “rescue” them in California before moving the shoot to Texas. They had said they “couldn't get anyone to send a woman to a motel” in Los Angeles. We explained to them this was “because sex traffickers won't send a woman to your hotel room in that manner”. Then I asked them if they didn't know this then what kind of “rescue” were they running? I asked to see this operation for myself and never heard from them again as a matter of fact. This was clearly one of the reasons why they changed the shoot to Houston.

So we had caught the first episode when it aired very curious about what was going on in connection with it. I don't know if you watched the show, but it immediately made no sense to me based on what I'm seeing coming into our hotline with respect to not only Backpage, but also sex trafficking itself. Since we have a chapter in Houston also, and were “friends” at one point with the Houston SWOP chapter, it really didn't make sense what we saw on that first show. Not when it was saying it was a “trafficking rescue”.

I say that based on the whole premise. What I saw on that first episode was them calling up ads on Backpage, that women were just showing up at their room, women who were all Hispanic, where every two minutes the narrator, or the host, was repeating the term “victim” without even knowing this woman's story first. (I mention this because if you watch Derrin Brown's videos on Youtube about how you can convince an innocent man he's guilty – these are the same techniques I was seeing being employed in “8 Minutes” right on down the line. Brainwashing the audience pure and simple. Since I was certified by the FBI as an expert witness in how brainwashing is done – then I know what I'm talking about. Which had me wondering why they would be wanting to “brainwash” the audience “sex trafficking victims” were found on Backpage” to be perfectly honest. I found it even stranger they named Backpage. I mean who says “oh you can find drugs on this corner” on the news like it's an ad you're running if you're trying to stop it.)

Then they were offered a chance to “just leave” with them within an eight minute time frame. I'm sorry but rescuing a REAL victim of sex trafficking takes a lot more time to plan and execute than eight minutes. Especially since most of them require their whole family relocated to safety before you can extract the direct victim because the first place the traffickers are going to show up when they go missing is their relative's house. Something which wasn't even being addressed in the episode I saw. Now you might be able to get a “prostitute” to agree to run off to get help with a strange man in 8 Minutes – but NOT a “real” sex trafficking victim”. In that case, a whole series of events would go into operation when they didn't return back to the appointed place at the appointed time, or when their GPS device was cut off or moved.

So I scratched my head and then turned the channel because it didn't really effect me I thought. Until my phone started ringing right after the show with people wanting my help to start staging “hotel stings”. Okay now I'm mad. I'm now answering my phone that I pay for which I receive no salary and for which I can't just go out and hire someone to help me with it either - for which is now ringing off the hook with fools who saw this show and now are thinking you execute a “sex trafficking rescue” with something like this nonsense. I'm now spending hours out of my day talking fools down off this ridiculous “hotel sting” set up people are seeing on this show and wanting my help with even. Something I wasn't even prepared for beforehand.

This is when I started trying to reach the producers directly because now the show is directly affecting me. To my surprise, they weren't answering my calls. Which didn't make sense to me. If you're going to be helping alcoholics – wouldn't you take a call from Bill Wilson or Alcoholics Anonymous? This further alerted me there was something very very fishy here and they were not running the operation they were claiming.
Then came the woman who told me she had been filmed for this show. She's been called “Kamylla” online. This woman told me she had been paid to speak scripted lines, and she was engaged in a play where Backpage was the named source of where she came from. She even told me her husband was paid to pretend to be her pimp. Not they “breached their promise” to “rescue” her but to not show her face.

What was upsetting her was she had been told their faces would be blurred out when the show aired, but that the faces she was seeing on the shows airing weren't blurred. This was scaring her people would think what they acted out on camera was “real”. Since she said she had three kids, and was not a legal citizen because she was from Brazil, she was scared this “branding” would get her deported, possibly cost her custody of her children. Maybe even get her husband arrested.

She asked for my help in stopping the episode with their faces from airing. I agreed to help her with this, and typed up a letter notifying the producer's, and A&E, I was going to be filing a request for an emergency temporary injunction against the show from airing because of her concerns about her face showing and the danger this could pose for her children. I further had found two things quite disturbing about the show – the fact only Hispanic women had been portrayed as “victims” for one. The other was their portrayal of what a “sex trafficking” victim is including they can be just ordered up into a hotel room like a pizza off Backpage. What I'd found especially offensive was that I had contacted their show during the taping about situations going on in pockets such as California, Nevada, Arizona, etc., which can now be openly discussed such as what was going on with Joohon David Lee and Celeste Guap just to name two public cases connected to the trafficking ring I've been dealing with for some years now.

I was seeing no mention at all in this so called “reality” show of the fact a sex trafficking victim COULDN'T just up and leave with them in “8 Minutes” because of this type of corruption. If anything, this show was making that sort of thing seem to not even exist. Much as how magicians will distract you with their left hand so you don't see what they're doing with their right. So when I'm seeing something labeled as a “reality show” making it appear that when you start calling up ads on Backpage in the adult section, you're going to get nothing but Hispanic women reporting to the camera they're “only doing this because they have kids to feed” and agreeing that quickly, and that simply, to walk off with these people into a recovery program, well I found it to be absolutely outrageously misleading about both illegal prostitution, as well as someone who is being pimped and some who is being trafficked in this country.

Look, things labeled as “real” when aired which aren't can be very damaging. I point you to the ACORN video about Obama, as well as the Planned Parenthood video tape – both staged as “reality” when in fact they were “staged”. One making Obama's people appear to be supporting sex trafficking, while the other was making Planned Parenthood appear to be forcing abortions upon women just so they can sell body parts. Now, was exposing these tapes for the frauds they were “attacking people” or “defending” the innocent, while also wanting to try and ensure that those truly guilty of such things are then exposed.

Things like this are important to me because I have yet to see a trafficking operation for one use a Planned Parenthood. Why would they when they leave records and cost money or health insurance? Neither of which sex traffickers are going to want to use in a situation with a victim. The sex traffickers I've known PREFER their victims pregnant and to give birth because it not only brings in more money from the “fetish” johns who like pregnant women – but also gives them an 18 year “leash” on their victims so they can't run from them without giving up their address or they can call in a “kidnapping” report. Meaning in reality the only way many victims who have children by their traffickers is to run to a country like Canada who doesn't extradite over things like child custody or visitation orders. Issues by the way I've yet to see discussed with Congress yet when talking about how to break away victims from their traffickers such as child custody.

Now, in reality, the traffickers I'm aware of don't just send out a woman to a hotel room in the manner portrayed in this show. While a prostitute might just up and come out to some room in that manner, a person who is being trafficked or even pimped seriously will not. They're not sending out anyone to any room unless they've screened this person for their real name, where they work, where they're from, and have some idea who this person is and where they work or what company they own. They're going to want to see an airplane ticket, a drivers' license, a credit card, and some other type of information so that if their victim goes missing – they know where to go looking to get her back. Even then, most of the time you have to have someone the traffickers trust “vouch” for you before they'll send anyone out to your place – especially if you're calling from a hotel. In those cases, you probably wouldn't even get an appointment unless you also showed them an airplane ticket or car rental which matched your drivers license, and even then you'd have to get someone to “vouch” for you who they do business with regularly.

So I found the whole thing very misleading. Especially since the “johns” I've been speaking to for a while now have been reporting the traffickers have been using this information they get on them to do things like hack into their bank accounts, blackmail them, even steal real estate equity right out from under them. Many report they're being drugged even and robbed. Then when they threaten to “go to the cops” they find they're being threatened by the cops to “back off” the whole matter “or else” their wife and boss might find out. You witnessed exactly this scenario when Lamar Odom overdosed in Nevada. He “ate” that $75,000 cash which was in his pocket and got the hell out of Nevada before the cops changed their minds about charging him for the drug possession for which there's no proof he put any of those in his system himself.

Something if you were showing REAL sex trafficking – then you'd be showing them putting the clients through these hoops traffickers do. Not showing them the procedure for what appears to be that of an “independent prostitute” who is simply on Backpage because they have free ads trying to get up money to buy food for her kids because she's out of work and so desperate this was all she could think of to do. But yet that's what I'm feeling I'm seeing portrayed and if you're going to be scripting and staging this – then why would you script and stage what is “independent sex work” and label it “sex trafficking”? Why mislead the public about the type of ads found on Backpage?

But I still didn't get involved in this whole show until again “Kamylla” asked for my help in stopping the episode with her, and her husband, from airing which was supposed to be that next week. She further said she was being evicted in two days and needed help with this because she was too broke to pay her rent. I agreed to help her on both accounts. The next morning I served upon A&E and Relativity Media the notice I was going to file for a “temporary emergency injunction” to stop the show from airing based on the safety of her children being endangered if the show aired showing their parents faces labeled as “prostitute” and “pimp” unblurred. Literally within four hours of my serving everyone with this notice, the website connected to the show was taken down completely. Within eight hours, news was going out the show had been “canceled”. I also need to add this woman who told me the day before she “couldn't afford an attorney” suddenly had THREE attorney's calling me every hour on the hour the next day trying to stop me from doing anything about her situation telling me “they were going to help her” yet not a one of them was HER attorney hired by her for her needs. These were attorney's acting on behalf of the producers & the show.

I further informed them I would be suing for what's called a “defamacast”. Not only was this show making it appear Hispanic women resorted to prostitution the minute they were having economic problems, nor could they take care of their children legally, but it was also slamming Backpage as the vehicle sex traffickers were using. I'm sorry but that's not where I'm seeing the hard core sex trafficking in this country being advertised. ANY hard core sex trafficker is WELL AWARE the police, the press, the groups such as the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, and THORN, are monitoring the ads on this site, as well as records of their phone and bank records are being turned over to the cops upon receipt of a warrant.

Any organized hard core real sex trafficker is therefore NOT going to use Backpage for exactly those reasons. I'm not alone in this knowledge either. Not when men like Chris Hanson are walking away from NBC and seeking crowdfunding so they can film a TRUE “reality” series showing where hard core sex traffickers are advertising, and how they operate, as he did when he left NBC. NBC who is another one who is filming these completely faked staged so called “reality” shows about sex trafficking also supposedly coming out of Backpage too I need to add where I've already filed complaints about them with the FCC. 'm still considering legal action against NBC for the way they've even faked shows about our group!
Let me tell you what I'm seeing from my end of the “elephant”. So we can speak a common language, I want to refer you back to the days of Prohibition. These were the days when organized crime, connected to such men as Al Capone, were so well “connected” as to be deemed “untouchable”. Not only had they connections with the police, the press, even the church, and politicians - but further they had the fact most people didn't even believe there even WAS a “cosa nostra”, or organized crime ring operating within the USA going for them. So when these guys wanted to shut down an “independent” bootlegger – it was easy. They turned him over to the cops, and everyone got to take a bunch of press for “shutting down a bootlegger”. The politicians got some good press, the local cops picked up some money, the court's got their fines – and organized crime got their point across not to make illegal booze unless you were a part of THEIR operation. If you wanted to make gin in your bathtub – then you'd be the one busted – not them.

Now when a bathtub gin bootlegger was arrested did this mean they weren't “arresting a bootlegger”? Sure they were. But that arrest was actually SERVING the “organized crime” ring in this country we now refer to as “the mob”. I say that because “the mob” wasn't even officially recognized until the 1960's when Joe Valachi stepped up with his confession about being a part of this “mob”. We didn't even have the “racketeering” laws back then which were written to address the fact there was a “difference” between a guy making moonshine in the Appalachian mountains to feed his kids vs. someone like Al Capone whose money went to fuel a very large, organized criminal operation. These guys were so “untouchable” a special team had to be organized popularized in the series “The Untouchable's”.
From our perspective on this end of the elephant – that's what I'm seeing is playing out here. A repeat of history itself. Especially considering this country didn't even recognize domestic sex trafficking as “real” until the Trafficking Act of 2000 was passed. So no I don't think we're at a point yet where as a country we understand the difference between an “independent sex worker” vs. a “trafficking victim” in terms like we now understand with respect to alcohol and Prohibition.

I'm sure you're aware the Mann Act of 1910 was what we had on the books before. That despite this talking about sending Chinese women who were being brought over here to be forced into prostitution back to China as “victims”, not “criminals”, using taxpayer money – only two people were ever arrested under the Mann Act before the year 2000. This was two black men who married white women – Chuck Berry and Joe Johnson. The reason for this is because most politicians, heck most people in this country, weren't being taught what sex trafficking even looked like over the years in between 1910 and 2000. In fact, I remember the 1968 popular film “Thoroughly Modern Millie” starring Julie Andrews actually making a musical comedy out of the very “idea” of Chinese sex trafficking of American women into opium dens. This laughter wouldn't have been so loud had it not been most people truly believed that sort of thing “didn't exist any longer” having left us with the days of the Barbary Coast and sailors being hijacked onto ships.

If you think about it, the most popular people we've had talking in major media since the year 2000 gave this issue federal recognition have all been complete and utter FRAUDS. Go down the list – Samoly Mam, Chong Kim, Stella Marr, William Hillar, etc. Out of those who are not frauds telling stories – how many are AMERICAN'S talking about AMERICAN sex trafficking?

Then out of those who are AMERICAN, how many are speaking about ORGANIZED SEX TRAFFICKING within the modern USA framework? Now you yourself only recently brought in Jessa Willow-Crisp to speak to the Colorado legislature about how the police were involved in trafficking her from Canada into this country. I found her story to ring true with the other stories I'm hearing again not about illegal prostitution, not about someone who is being pimped, but as to someone who is being TRAFFICKED.
Yet I did NOT hear even Jessa speaking about her traffickers using Backpage as their method of operating.

For another, I failed to hear her, or anyone connected to her, addressing the fact the current system we have in this country is STILL not set up to address just this very fact. Joohon David Lee, after me spending years trying to get anyone I could to listen to me to do something about not just that man, but the whole trafficking operation he was only but a part of like a spoke on a wheel, was only charged with bribery after I finally got someone at the Office of Professional Responsibility to open up an investigation into him.

The reason? Because we don't have laws on the books to arrest him for what he actually did to – which included not only placing a completely fake case on an innocent family in Las Vegas, but further he was physically going to pick up victims in China, and then Korea (once I tipped off LAX and the Dept. of Transportation about his activity in China), and not only flying them over here on taxpayer money, but he was also physically walking the victims past LAX security. Now I ask you – where is a person who has just been flown to the states, and walked past LAX security using a Homeland Security badge and ICE credentials, who you know is also on the trafficking task force, to call for help in this country?

Your hotline? Knowing you're going to do what now exactly? In the mind of this victim all you're going to do is refer them right back to him so frankly they aren't going to call you. I'm willing to bet you even a cash bet not one victim of Joohon's did call your hotline in fact to prove my point. I know they called mine. They called mine because we promote you can call us for any reason and that we're not connected to such offices in any way – that all calls to us are completely “confidential”.

I'd also like to point out that training prepared by your office for LAX security did not anywhere in the training materials I was able to get ahold and review mention ANYTHING, not one word, about what airport personnel is supposed to do when they suspect someone in his offices is doing what he did – walking victims right past them into this country. To further prove my point, Celeste Guap has stated she was warned when trafficking “raids” were going to be executed in order that she stay away from them. Now, if they were doing this to keep her away from raids, then why would she advertise on Backpage knowing it's being watched by as many as it is for sex trafficking? I've seen how she advertised her services – and it was NOT on Backpage. If anything, it was advertised on Facebook and Google. Two sites I've seen with respect to sex trafficking, as well as other sites like Youtube, Grinder, Snapchat, etc., But yet I've not seen one word about them in all this Backpage witch hunting. Nope, if you look at all of the arrests in the last couple of years such as Backpage, The Erotic Review, Redpage, Rentboy – what they share in common is that INDEPENDENT sex workers use them NOT sex traffickers. I can can point to the site which was the focus of the Seattle arrests this year – this website, nor their victims, were advertised on Backpage.

But I will tell you this – it's also spreading fast now “on the streets” (thanks to these “influencers” who have been recruited by the real sex industry in this country, who by the way now include Google thanks to Oculus,and Facebook, thanks to their app who directs “johns” to their closest massage parlor, strip clubs, or even escort services, who some might even say view Backpage as a “competitor” to advertising sexual services for hire), when someone does call our hotline for help we going to now be ignored completely if we try and reach out to a group like yours for help – because you have ignored us when we have tried to talk to you about such situations to date.

Why? I don't know other than I get told to “have the victim call themselves” and then I'm cut off. Well again if that was the case then they'd be calling you then instead of me wouldn't they? Thus leaving both our calls essentially unanswered when I've tried to come talk to your group about their situations. By your group refusing to hear from this back end of the elephant that the tail I'm looking at looks a lot different than the ears you've got a hold of – then I don't think you've got as clear of a picture of what this American elephant really looks like anymore than I have a clear idea what things look like outside the reach of what our program can offer by and of itself.

So I'm just reaching out to you right now to let you know what I believe we're witnessing here with the arrest of Carl Ferrer is not what it appears to be on the surface. I know your intent, as well as the intent of those others connected to this whole thing, is to not just to shut down real sex traffickers, but to also help the victims escape this type of operation, as well as to try and just shut down the whole process itself.

However, I can't be more clear that this subject needs to be viewed much again like that of alcohol. Not everyone who drinks alcohol is an alcoholic. Nor is everyone who makes alcohol a “bootlegger”. Keep in mind that to reach an alcoholic, even they are in denial about just that fact sometimes for years into even going to AA meetings they “have a problem”. Very few alcoholics will readily even admit to themselves, or other people, they are in fact one without sometimes hitting a very hard “bottom”. The same sadly applies to “sex trafficking victims” in many cases. Very few who are “victims” will often readily admit they are. Not only have I seen many take sometimes years into recovery to come to grips with that fact, but I myself even didn't even begin to grasp how much of what I went through was forced upon me until I also had years clean and in recovery to be distanced enough from it to truly see things for what they were.

Also, to the guy working at the local “drunk tank” rounding up drunks on a Friday night, it may appear to them everyone who drinks is an alcoholic. The same for someone who was working at a “wet farm” where many went to die from “wet brain”. You may not realize this, but until Alcoholics Anonymous was formed, the diagnosed alcoholic was often treated as if they were mentally ill – some even had lobotomies forced upon them by those who thought they “must be insane” because of the way they wouldn't “stop drinking”. Meaning a proper “diagnosis” of a situation is important to find the proper solution.

The last count I saw of your hotline was you'd answered about 100,000 calls. I want you to know we did a calculation based off phone bills and we counted our hotline has answered over 500,000 calls as of 2013. I think you should also know I've been the one person answering about 98 % of all of those calls myself over the years since 1987 when we launched the hotline and 12 step program.

So I've developed a pretty good view not only of the sex industry worldwide, and others around the world since our hotline is international, but also over time these 30 or so years. I should add with a community of people who aren't calling your hotline nor really having anything to do with your organization. I don't know of ANYONE who has been around this field longer, or with more people, nor a wider variety of those involved in this subject, than myself with respect to adults. The only other person I believe with more time than me has more experience with juveniles than myself – Lois Lee from Children of the Night. Meaning I think my opinion on things involving this issue are valuable. You might know a lot of “survivors” but I doubt you know anyone other than myself who has a broader range of experiences in this field than myself being I've seen it from the very beginning over a span of three decades now from all different types of views.

The show “8 Minutes” wasn't the only time I saw someone creating “fake” media to make it appear “sex trafficking” was happening mostly on Craigslist or Backpage. What I found even more interesting was how MUCH media went into covering that fact up. Why CNN did a whole hour called “The Truth about 8 Minutes” which was just as faked as the show about why it was supposedly canceled. Showing a lot of people went to a lot of trouble to try and cover up the show was “faked”. Now why do that? I mean your group I'm sure has even wondered why they would use your hotline against your permission – so haven't you wondered about this yourself what was going on with respect to that show?

8 Minutes” was not the first time I've seen false ads being placed on Backpage to make it also appear sex trafficking is happening on the site. I find it even more interesting my IP address is blocked from placing any ad for SWA on Backpage or Craigslist. I've tested both and the ads are not “flagged” but actually programmed to not run ads from our IP address. So I'm not doubting the truth of your statement when you say you've “had 2000 calls reporting sex trafficking activity on Backpage”. I am however questioning whether or not those calls might have been faked also. I mean if someone went to all the trouble and expense to fake a whole series to make it appear this way, to put an hour show on CNN about it further covering up this was faked, and then send in paid “influencers” to try and shut me from talking about it – then it's not beyond reasonable to think they might have used these “influencers” to stage fake calls to you.

I want to again point out Joohon David Lee had put a whole innocent family under arrest to deflect from what he was really doing. So I'll put it this way – what proof have you looked at which would show you the accusations against Backpage are being staged in the same manner as what Joohon did to that family? Because again this is not being done just to deflect attention – but to further try and pressure the “independents” into going to work for them by making it impossible to operate otherwise. Just identical to how I had it done to me back in the day to try and force me to work under them then (not the same people obviously but the same system), and to also shut down avenues of escape as was also done to me back in 1984 when they came after me to shut down the safe house. Which is why I brought up to you about my own past experience personally – because I've seen this exact thing before in my own life, as well as I've been watching it unfold over three decades. I also see the direct connections between the patterns I'm seeing now and what was going on “back in the day” with respect to alcohol, Prohibition, bootleggers, and the difference between the alcohol industry vs. the criminals using bootlegging to build an empire.

For that matter, I'm even watching what appears to be a repeat of when Pablo Escobar was in the Mexican Congress, and the Columbian Cartel had reached such a point of power in the 1990's a “faceless justice committee” had to be put together because one couldn't even report drug trafficking back then without being automatically whacked no different than when Pablo's opponents were dealt with much the same. I don't know if you know this – but many are saying Celeste Guap's mother was involved in her trafficking. That she was a 911 operator who was placed in that job to further execute the operations of the sex trafficking ring which has publicly identified at least 30 officers to date involved. Again I ask you – HOW can a victim of such a operation knowing this system is in place call anyone in authority for help? All the more reason again why we get calls you don't over there at Polaris.

The sex industry IS an industry – no different than any other such as alcohol, tobacco, gambling, farming, mining, or any other “industry” where labor is short and exceeds demand. When you combine it with a “black market' by making something illegal as prostitution is, some pornography is, and slap “shame” on it as much of the sex industry is also tied to – and we are witnessing something no different than the days of Al Capone or even Iran Contra when cocaine was flooded into this country by our own government's hand. A government which uses sex to make it's deals just as much as it does cash. If that wasn't true, the House Ethics Committee would not have ruled prostitutes don't have to be accounted for when noting “politician donations”.

So I don't know if you realize you're supporting what essentially is Al Capone trying to stamp out someone who isn't part of “their” operation, trying to force “independents” to “come on board” - but from where I'm sitting at the back end of this elephant – that's what I'm seeing is going on. Now if you have a different perspective, I'd love to hear about it.

In fact, I'd love to be able to have your people hear from our whole side of the fence which when I checked my database last month numbered at 190,000 active members worldwide. But again I can't get you talking to “them” if you aren't willing to talk to “me”. People who are trying to maintain their “anonymity” because some people tend to look down on us as “beneath” being treated with respect as any other human being are kind of funny that way. You know what that's like don't you? When you walk into a room back at high school and you've got the “soshie” kids acting like you don't even warrant recognition you entered the room? That kind of treatment doesn't really encourage them to really want to step out outside of our group to talk about their experiences.

I'm not going to apologize for the length of this letter. Had we been afforded an open line of communication previous to this, I wouldn't feel the need to try and sum up 30 years in a letter to you today. But I've been getting quite a few phone calls lately from members saying “don't they realize that . . . “ to where I realized “No I don't know if they realize that . . . . “. so this is why I'm attempting to try and convey our view on this elephant to you and hope maybe we can open up a dialogue. Because if I were you, I wouldn't want to think I was knowingly, or unknowingly, supporting organized sex traffickers in any manner.

Would you?


Jody Williams