THROWING THE BABY OUT WITH THE BATHWATER
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-10_21p3.pdf http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/agency-for-international-development-v-alliance-for-open-society-international-inc/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agency_for_International_Development_v._Alliance_for_Open_Society_International,_Inc. Since the TVRA of 2003 - there was a push that anyone who received federal money to work with trafficking victims could not do so without signing an agreement opposing prostitution. For some reason, people who can't be very intelligent have confused that to mean to also oppose Sex Workers Anonymous. Why? I have no clue . I have no idea how we're "supporting prostitution". We're no more supporting prostitution than Alcoholics Anonymous supports the alcohol industry or Narcotics Anonymous supports medical marijuana. Don't get it. But the Supreme Court ruled it was unconstitutional to block anyone receiving federal money from working with another agency t